U radu je uspoređen utjecaj dvije različite tehnologije izvođenja građevina visokogradnje na vrijeme i troškove građenja. Prikazane su zgrade koje bi bile iste namjene i zadovoljavale sve kriterije u pogledu funkcionalnosti, stabilnosti, trajnosti kao i želje investitora. Kako bi se usporedba različitih tehnologija građenja na vrijeme i troškove građenja mogla napraviti, već u fazi koncipiranja je potrebno planirati troškove građevine, trajanja aktivnosti i raspored resursa. Metode planiranja su opisane u teorijskom dijelu ovog rada. U praktičnom dijelu su prikazani modeli građevina koje se mogu izvesti na dva načina: U prvom slučaju se gradi s nosivim zidovima i polumontažnom „monta“ stropnom konstrukcijom dok u drugom slučaju nosivu konstrukciju čini sustav armiranobetonskih stupova, greda i ploča. Izrađeni su troškovnici za oba slučaja te su prikazani odnosi troškovno značajnih aktivnosti. Prilikom izračuna trajanja aktivnosti korištena je PERT metoda (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) te je prikazana vjerojatnost izvršenja za oba načina građenja. Izrađeni su dinamički planovi za oba slučaja te su izrađeni gantogrami, histogram radne snage i krivulja toka novca u vremenu. Nakon izračuna, uspoređeni su rezultati oba slučaja te je dan prikaz prednosti, nedostataka i mogućih promjena kako bi se nedostaci uklonili.

This thesis compares the impact of two different construction methods on time and costs of building construction. Building used for comparison have same purpose and meets all the criteria regarding functionality, stability, durability and owners wishes. In order to make comparisons of influences of building technology on costs and time of project, in concept phase it is necessary to plan construction costs, time of activities and resource allocation. Planning methods are explained in theoretical part of this thesis. In the practical part, a construction model of the building is presented in two ways: In the first case, it is built with load-bearing walls and semi-prefabricated „monta“ ceiling, while in the other case the supporting structure is made of reinforced concrete columns, beams and slabs. Costs are calculated for both cases and relationships of cost-effective activities are shown. When calculating the duration of activities, the PERT method (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) was used and the probability of execution for both cases was presented. Scheduling plans were made for both cases. Both cases are presented in form of gantt-charts, workflow histograms and cash flow curves. After the calculations, the results of both cases were compared and shown with their advantages, disadvantages and possible changes in order to remove those disadvantages.